Introduction
In a professional career one gets inveigled into peripheral activities that are not always ‘central’ to architectural or planning practice concerns. Not all such involvements bear fruit and may better be described as: earnest concerns, or aspirational endeavours or sometimes just plain time wasters. The following is a brief outline of such related intersections. Some were successful but not all. However, in all conscience, we really have no option but to be involved in this ‘extra mural stuff’ and each according to their own capabilities. My involvements are covered in the following five groups:
1. The Professional Institutes
- The Australian Institute of Architects (AIA) and The Board of Architects.
- The Architects Accreditation Council of Australia (AACA).
- The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) and the Urban Design Chapter.
- The Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand (EIANZ).
2. Worthy Bodies and Interested Parties
This is the mixed bag of several intersections that do not fit easily into the more formal professional Institute activities, or other defined categories in this overview, but nonetheless do important work.
3. Publicity and the The Media
Being extracts of some involvements with both Radio and the Press
4. State and Local Government Involvement
ACT Government and the North Sydney Council Urban Design Panels
5. Research Projects
Including involvement with Unisearch, The Standards Association of Australia and The Natural Heritage Charter
1. The Professional Institutes
Much time was spent as an examiner for the Board of Architects. This government body is charged with ensuring the requirements of The Architect’s Act, regarding practitioner registration are faithfully carried out. For freshly graduated architects there is a required period of practical experience and then the sitting of the Board’s Exams before being let loose on an unsuspecting public as fully fledged registered professional architects – that is if they have passed the exam. In particular these various involvements rolled out as follows:
1989 – 1990
I became involved in lecturing to the Australian Institute of Architects (AIA) NSW Chapter in their Professional Development Program Documentation course in the subject Methodology and Programming.
In 1997
I was a member of the Jury Panel for the ACT Chapter Awards and later on I was again a Jury Panel member for the architects working in the Wollongong area.
In 2005
I received advice from the Architects Accreditation Council of Australia (AACA) ACT I was accepted as an examiner for the registration of architects and as an examiner both in the ACT and NSW. For some years in NSW and the ACT I took mainly the viva voce component of the exam.
The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) Urban Design Chapter
In 2004
I joined the newly constituted Urban Design Chapter of the Planning Institute of Australia (PIA). It was formerly the Royal Australian Planning Institute but they were quick to let go of the ‘Royal’ bit. The PIA had opened its admission doors to suitable members by establishing Chapters in specialist areas such as Social Planning, Urban Design and other areas.
Environment Institute of Australia (EIA) and later (EIAZ)
In 1993
After completion of my Master of Environmental Studies Degree I became a member of the Environment Institute of Australia (EIA). In many ways and of the other professional Institutes I gave time to, this one was to me the most important from any point of view. I became an examiner of the EIA Certification Panel as well as holding a number of the Institute’s Executive posts.
In 1995
I was appointed NSW Councillor for the EIA and attended the Institute conference in Brisbane and in the following year, whilst carrying on as the NSW Councillor, I was asked at the end of that year to join the EIA Executive which I did.
In 1998
I continued as the ACT Councillor for the EIA and also on the Executive, and attended the Annual EIA Conference in Sydney, and carried on as a member of the Earth Foundation.
In 1999
A visit to Hobart in December 1999 included the delivering of a paper at the EIA National Conference. The paper was entitled ‘Urban Management and Associated Environmental Issues in Asian Megacities’.
2. Worthy Bodies and Interested Parties
Commonwealth Heritage Commission
In 1979
I received several commissions from the Commonwealth Heritage Commission to evaluate many individual buildings for possible listing by the Commission.
Building Science Forum BSF
In 1991
I delivered a lecture on Glass in Architecture to the ACT BSF which was later published in the Building Economist. Vol 3 No 2 September 1991.
Urban Design Forum
In 1997
I became a member of Canberra’s Urban Design Forum an informal alliance of local planners active in organising informative conferences.
Architectural Association of Australia (AAA)
In 2004
I became a member of the Major Events committee of the Architectural Association of Australia (AAA) a Sydney–based initiative sponsored by BlueScope Steel. The aim was to make accessible architectural projects to interested members of the public. This worked well.
3. Publicity and the Media
Radio
In 1976
I was elected to the Board of Environmental Studies (University of Adelaide) as a student representative. In that year I organised a series regular radio broadcasts on environmental issues with the ABC at the Adelaide Station of 5AN. It was an interview format and individual students spoke about the environmental concerns of their particular discipline.
The Press
In 2005 to 2010
Elsewhere and referred to in detail in the section Writing and Illustration, Rodney Jensen and I started and maintained an online journal called Cityscape covering a wide range of architectural, planning, environmental, infrastructure, social and economic themes.
4. State and Local Government
Involvement – A number of Councils have design review panels and they can be defined by a various titles as in Urban Design Advisory Committee or Urban Design Review Committee or IHAP which is an Independent Hearing and Assessment Panel known as a Local Planning Panel under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
ACT Government Urban Design Advisory Committee
In 1997
I was invited to become a member of the Urban Design Advisory Committee ACT (UDAC) which was established to provide advice to the ACT Minister of Planning on all significant proposed new works.
North Sydney Council Urban Design Review Panel
From 2003
I was invited to be a member of the North Sydney Council Urban Design Review Panel and continued in this involvement up until 2010. It is worth remembering that North Sydney Council is the next largest Council area after Sydney so that alone makes it a hugely complex area.
5. Research Projects
Unisearch
1990
DEM was a member of the University of New South Wales Building Research Centre trading under the name of Unisearch and the particular research being undertaken at that time was building façade engineering. I was actively involved in Centre during that period. Our submission to Government for research funding did not succeed.
The Standards Association of Australia
The Standards Association of Australia does wonderful work in establishing a host of standards for products, procedures and required outcomes for an almost unimaginable range of human activity.
1995
I was a member of subcommittee BD/64/3 Planning and Sub-Division being one of three subcommittees, focused on building in fire zone areas, the other two subcommittees were concentrating their enquiries on the nature of material combustibility and also constructional standards. Our aim was to get our joint findings as a reference document to the Building Code of Australia. This did not happen.
Natural Heritage Charter
1995
I was invited to participate in the consultative discussions in the drafting of the development of the: Interim Australian Natural Heritage Charter for the Conservation of Places of Natural Heritage Significance which achieved its objective.
On Reflection
Reflecting on the above, and what such extra mural involvement might mean; does it contribute to any greater purpose and is it worth the effort? However, looking at it from the perspective of everyone doing nothing, on any of these fronts, then it does not need forensic exploration to be certain that the unwieldy systems we operate under would be greatly diminished and decline due to the lack of exploration and growth from below. So we really have no option but to continue the extra mural stuff.